home edit page issue tracker

This page pertains to UD version 2.

Tokenization and Word Segmentation

In general, we consider as a token those elements that have a clear syntactic position. Phenomena with no written counterpart — pauses, non-verbal noises, anonymized content — are only tokenized when they can be given such a position; otherwise they are represented as features on a neighbouring token, or not represented at all. The rest of this chapter goes through the main cases.

Numbers and acronyms

Numbers can appear in a transcript either as figures or spelled out; in both cases they are annotated as NUM.

Acronyms, when transcribed as their phonetic realization, are a single token: for instance esseoesse for “S.O.S”, as the acronym is pronounced in Italian.

Pauses

We distinguish three kinds of pause: silent, filled, and long. The following options are on the table:

These strategies are not mutually exclusive: a treebank may, for instance, use PauseAfter for short pauses while still tokenizing longer silences as [PAUSE].

Open question: what about pauses that occur between transcription units, rather than within one? Inter-unit pauses are currently not annotated as such, but they remain queryable via the relative timing of the surrounding tokens, e.g.:

pattern { X1 [End]; X2 [Begin]; X1 < X2 }

(see example)

Non-verbal behaviours

Non-verbal behaviours (laughs, coughs, other noises) are not, by default, part of the syntactic construction. Current practice (Italian-KIParla) is to remove them from the treebank altogether, rather than tokenizing them. The only trace they leave is on a neighbouring token, via the feature Manner=read|sing|..., used when that token is itself produced while reading or singing.

Anonymized/Pseudonymized tokens

Personal or otherwise sensitive information (names, places, institutions, etc.) is frequently anonymized or pseudonymized in spoken corpora. Anonymized items generally have a clear syntactic position — they occupy an argument or adjunct slot just like the word they replace — and are therefore treated as ordinary tokens, integrated into the tree with the relation that fits their function.

Two conventions are attested:

Category-specific placeholders are preferable whenever the corpus needs to preserve coreference between anonymized mentions (e.g. distinguishing two different anonymized speakers referred to later in the same conversation).